FOMC Adjusts Policy Rate Over Weak Job Market Concerns

By George Ratiu |

3 minute read

The Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee looks to balance its dual mandate, which focuses on maximum employment and inflation running at 2.0%, amid a changing economic landscape. The Federal Open Market Committee cut the funds rate by 25 basis points at the September meeting, spurred by significant downward revisions to not only the summer jobs numbers, but also those of the 12 months which ended in March of this year.  

Employment data highlights rising concerns from business executives over weakening consumer confidence which could lead to a pullback in spending and sliding revenues. Retail sales have been resilient, showing consumers are still weathering rising prices. Despite ongoing consumer momentum, companies are taking steps to trim costs. The number of open jobs has been deflating since the March 2022 peak when they reached 12.1 million. As of the latest data, there were 7.2 million posted positions.  

Mirroring the slumping demand, companies added a mere 22,000 workers to their payrolls in August, a sharp downturn from the monthly average of 150,000 to 200,000 seen during a healthy economy. In addition, a recent Bureau of Labor Statistics data revision showcased that the economy added 911,000 fewer jobs during the March 2024 through March 2025 period, further signaling that employment is on shaky ground. 

The Fed has been under months of intense pressure to lower rates. Over the past nine months, the central bank has been closely monitoring not only the jobs data but also the trajectory of price gains. Worryingly for the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), after sliding toward the bank’s desired target of 2.0%, inflation has rebounded in the past few months as the imposition of tariffs on most trading partners meant that importers have been passing higher costs onto consumers. Both the Consumer Price Index and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index have been accelerating since April 2025. 

For the 12 members of the FOMC, the experience of the late 1970s and early 1980s serves as a cautionary reminder that economic shocks—like this year’s tariffs—combined with inflationary pressures can force the central bank to take more drastic monetary actions in case of runaway inflation. Informed by the lessons of that time, the committee has taken a steady approach to its monetary actions, combining gradual rate changes and balance sheet reduction. 

For capital markets, today’s decision by the Federal Reserve translates into lower interest rates. Investors anticipated a shift in monetary policy as evidenced by the sustained decline in the 10-year Treasury since the start of September.  

The big question surrounds the likelihood of additional rate cuts at the two remaining meetings in October and December of this year. While the Fed remains open to making necessary adjustments to its policy stance, it will continue to rely on incoming economic data. 

For consumers, the FOMC’s decision today will likely ripple through the financial system within a couple of months. While interest rates for personal loans, auto loans and credit cards could see marginal improvement, they will continue at elevated levels.  

For real estate markets, the Fed’s monetary stance has more of a psychological impact in the near future. Buyers, sellers and agents, who have been hoping for lower mortgage rates for over two years, may feel relief at the shift. However, mortgage rates are not directly linked to the Fed’s overnight rate, following longer-term bond yields instead. The recent drop in the 10-year Treasury has already pushed mortgage rates visibly lower, with the 30-year fixed rate tumbling from 6.6% in August to 6.1% at the midpoint of September. At the current pace, markets may see rates fall into 5.0% territory in the last quarter of the year. 

Looking toward the end of the year, the Fed must focus on balancing concerns over a slumping jobs market with the threat of rising prices. With housing comprising the largest share of household costs, addressing affordability remains a critical priority for many Americans.